In this blog - The Ultimate x453gogjf94rturdrfglrkto I am trying to test some new parameters. this time I am going to test number of repeats against keyword density.
The hypothesis is a simple one - that the density filter is simply there to flag sites as spammy and de-list them, and that the thing that actually boosts relevance from an onpage point of view is simply the number of repeats a certain phrase gets.
To perform this test I am going to be testing directly against the winner of the first test, the 'Method' site which had 18 repeats of the keyword, but with a density of 4.86%. My objective then is to produce a page here which has more than 18 mentions of the target keyword, but which keeps the density lower than 4.86% - this should determine whether my hypothesis is correct or not. So far I have made one mention of the target key phrase x453gogjf94rturdrfglrkto well, that makes two now, to get the density correct I am going to have to make many, many more mentions of this word - but I am going to have to type a lot of text around these mentions in order to keep the percentage density down. After this fairly long paragraph, considering that so far I've only mentioned it twice - I think it's probably safe for me to make a third mention of the word x453gogjf94rturdrfglrkto so that's three down and only fifteen to go - or at least to draw even.
There is some theory that the prominence of the KW is also a factor - how google determines prominence I don't know - but it is possible this is a factor. Unfortunately discovering how that fits into the formula is probably beyong the scope of this text so I will have to ignore it for now, instead I will write some more - keep the density down, keep it low but try to increase the number of mentions so that it is higher than the Method site. Right - that should do, mention 4 of the word x453gogjf94rturdrfglrkto.
Of course this all might be a bit of a waste of time - while doint this experiment I am running a parallel experiment on the same keyword, but on a site which doesn't mention the word at all in it's content - only in the anchor text of links which point to the site. Initially it's only one site linking in on the correct anchor - but I want to give it a chance and see if it it indexes on that alone, it is possible it doesn't, if it doesn't then I will probably make a few more links. Ultimately I want to be able to test where the backlinks with relevant anchor text starts to trump good keyword density and content. In some respects it's always possible to use this off-page technique to trump the on-page simply because of the far reaching scope and the fact that it is impossible to fairly penalize people for off-page linking to their sites, whereas the content on your page is a clear indicator of content and quality nad it is obviously something you have control over - and that is the key factor.
Having written some more - I think I can now mention the word again so I will say it, x453gogjf94rturdrfglrkto there you go I said it, x453gogjf94rturdrfglrkto there you go I said it again, now I ought to probably try to write some more stuff then drop it it again, I am getting quite a good length of article now, the density should be nice and low but the problem is I simply haven't managed to get enough mentions of the word in - how to tackle this I don't know - at the moment I am simply writing anything - but trying to keep it making sense - pouring my mind onto the page and typing as fast as my battle-weary fingers will type. I have mentioned it six times now - so that's six down and at least twelve more to go, I probably haven't quite written enough for the next mention yet - well, maybe I did - I suppose I could slip one more in? Do you think ? Okay, here goes x453gogjf94rturdrfglrkto there you go I said it again - shall we do another?
I think I ought to at least start a new paragraph now - i can then type a little buit more, put a few more sentences in - then maybe get another mention in, not sure I'm ready yet, erm, shall I mention it again ? I probably ought to - or ought I write a bit more ? I went on Holuiday to Dorset earlier this year - we were going to go to Germany, but unfortunately time was not on our side... I am having a riot playing Left 4 Dead 2, but it's driving my wife mad... Erm, what else can I say? I'm looking forwards to getting home tonight to see my little girl... We might do some lego together, maybe, not sure - erm, can I mention one? I suppose I can here we go x453gogjf94rturdrfglrkto there that's another out of the way, now how much do I need to to write to get mention number 8 in? Well, I ought to write a buit miore - I really should, I like Bob Dylan, and Ozzy Osbourne, as well as Metallica - but my favourite band is Dragon Force, they really are awesome, it's quite amazing that they can play their instruments as fast as the can, by the way x453gogjf94rturdrfglrkto .
Righty ho I now think that's 7 or eight mentions, do another for good measure - x453gogjf94rturdrfglrkto there you go - that got one in, I really hope tis page indexes and I can draw some meaningful conclusions to this idea. I wonder also whether clumping affects the relevance? Its going to be difficult to test for that - but then if it's difficult to test for it might be difficult for the algorithim to test for so maybe it doesn't? I can probably mention it again now anyhow so I weill mention x453gogjf94rturdrfglrkto for what i think is now the 9th time? Possibly anywhay - the other articles were all fairly short - but I finding this one mind-numbingly boring to write, incredibly hard word - I am so bored out of my skull!!
There is a real temptatetion to just spam a few in - but I don't want to do that - I want to keep this content so it doesn't look spammy - particularly when talking about the target keyword. Still I've now written another small paragraph so I should be able to sneak another little mention in? Just a teensy mention of x453gogjf94rturdrfglrkto which I am now on over ten mentions with and I think I am keeping the density low.
What I will do once I have written this is ave a headache, despite writing another x453gogjf94rturdrfglrkto mention into the document, it should be a fairly good test now - I believe we are now on thirteen... think I might have lost track of how many times I have mentioned it this time - maybe I should check? Yes I checked - we are on thirteen now so I only need another five or so mentions and lots of text around it for the test to be right so here we go again x453gogjf94rturdrfglrkto. I've mentioned it fourteen times, now and I need to mention it probably at least another five - well I tell you what, x453gogjf94rturdrfglrkto now that's another four at least?
My my, what can I write about now? I really don't know? Erm, I could write about erm, video games or erm, seo stuff, or erm, well I could write about? Erm, how about I write about x453gogjf94rturdrfglrkto would that be a good idea? Maybe - at least it's another mention of the bleeding word in - before my brain melts through boredom too no less! Although that is a possiblity - I am having to fight hard to keep my eyes open through this torturous task. God it's boring - and I still need a few more mentiosn, ho hum, when can I mention it? Well um, I suppose i can now can I ? Okay I will it's x453gogjf94rturdrfglrkto the most boring task ever, the most annoying thint to have to try and do in recent memory - I just hope this irritating test actually yields the interesting results I am hoping it will. It does need some more mentions for it to be a good test though so I will have to upt some more in - here goes another one x453gogjf94rturdrfglrkto there we go ? Hmmm, how many do we need now ? Perhjaps I ought to count up the other ones so I know exactly where we are ? right I think we are on 18 or 19 now - so x453gogjf94rturdrfglrkto that should take us over by one another one x453gogjf94rturdrfglrkto should take us up a bit more and for added prominence - what the hell let's finish on one more x453gogjf94rturdrfglrkto.
No comments:
Post a Comment